So now the Government have decided to “mass-medicate”
the entire population by forcing us to drink rat poison! This
may sound rather alarmist, but look at this.

1. Local Health Authorities have power to order water
companies to add fluoride to our domestic water supplies,
whether we want it or not.

2. Fluoride is “good” for teeth, but only up to a point.  Then it causes “mottling” – unsightly blue/grey blemishes on teeth and enamel damage that cannot be repaired.

3. Fluoride is a toxic by-product of aluminium production, and its disposal is costly and complicated. Chucking it in our water supply is cheap and simple.

4. Adolf Hitler put fluoride in water supplies of countries he invaded to make the population more “docile” so they would conform to his orders and be less likely to rebel.

5. Scientific studies show that fluoride destroys the essential iodine in our bodies. The effects include dementia, lower IQ in growing children, and tendencies to osteoporosis, brittle bones and rheumatism.

6. Fluoride only works on the teeth when applied directly to them (ie by brushing with fluoride toothpaste), it does not reach them via the bloodstream. Drinking fluoridated water is as good for the teeth as eating a plaster cast is for a broken arm!

7. Southampton’s Health Authority has decided to add fluoride to the water supply. They were legally obliged to conduct a public consultation, which they did. This revealed that the County Council as well as 72% of the population were against fluoridation. But they are imposing it anyway, because they can.

8. Kirklees Council (my local council) decided by a simple show of hands that it will happen in West Yorkshire as well.

My opinion.  There would appear to be sinister motives behind this master plan to control the population. Could it simply be a cheap way to get rid of poisonous waste from aluminium production? Could it be that sales of bottled water (in which certain Government figures are rumoured to have a financial interest) will soar? Or will the next stage be to add other dangerous chemicals to the water to dope us into total submission? But whatever the motive, one thing is clear – our civil liberties are being infringed. Even if fluoride is good for us, we have a right to decide whether or not we take it, no government has the right to dictate this to us.

But don’t just take my word for it. Form your own opinions after looking at some of these websites. (Click underlined links).
 
  1. Fluoride Alert – the dangers of poisoning our water
  2. The Independent (newspaper) debate
  3. The Sky News debate
  4. The Daily Telegraph blog
  5. Huddersfield Examiner article
  6. The Green Party website
  7. A so-called “independent” pro-fluoridation website (probably operated by the Government!)

LATEST NEWS! (18th March 2011)
People in Scotland have been warned not to drink the water, because "unusually high levels of aluminium" have been discovered in their supplies! Looks like the aluminium producers have got carried away dumping their poisonous waste fluoride, and got rid of surplus aluminium as well! Click HERE to read the full article.

The spokesman, Geoff Aluminiumhead, (or something like that!) Scottish Water's asset management director, said: "We would like to reassure our customers in the area that this is a precautionary, temporary measure and we are doing everything possible to restore normal supplies as soon as possible. We would like to apologise to people in the affected areas."

The advice, issued in conjunction with the consultant in public health medicine at NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, is that water should not be used for drinking, food preparation, making babies' feeds, brushing teeth or for pets. Drinks and ice-dispensing machines should also be avoided as these may be connected to the mains supply. However, in the affected areas, water can still be used for washing clothes, baths and showers and for flushing toilets. Scottish Water said it was arranging alternative supplies to the areas affected, initially giving priority to customers who require additional support, including the elderly, disabled, hospitals and care homes, and then continuing provision to the rest of the community. (AOL).

I won't add too many comments of my own, except perhaps to remind everyone that when I added this page in March 2009 I got a few adverse comments about it. To those who still think I'm over-reacting I'll simply say "YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! IT'S HAPPENING......"